The Gay Inc Campaign Against Obama. And Why We’re Sick ‘N’Tired Of it
You know, we were just going to shut down for the night when we saw something (on Facebook naturally—we’re addicts—what can we say?) One of our friends had posted a photo of Obama on his profile; it showed up on our homepage. It was one of our gay white friends. And the picture was less than flattering. Here it is:
For some reason this was the very first time something like this hurt our heart. Really. It hit home. We looked at this picture and tears began to well up in our eyes. It’s been long hellish Saturday quite frankly folks. The car died, the unemployment check didn’t come, we bitterly lost an online raffle for 2 dozen cupcakes—but we did recoup on a dozen thanks to Hank Hedland’s sweetness—here’s the link to his yum yummy Cakified baked goods by the way—-and we also spent the mornin’ fightin’ and emailing back ‘n’ forth with Vincent Jones (who deep down inside we cherish dearly— he jus’ made us mad is all—-and we like to reimburse the pain.)
So yeah, we guess after all that our emotions were a tad tender. When we saw this photo we just thought without skipping a beat, ‘We’re sick of Gay Inc. pickin’ on Obama. We’re really sick of their shit.’
You see, we been dealing with white leadership in this country high and low all of our lives. So have our parents. And our parents parents. And our parents parents parents. Speaking as persons who have emerged from an extremely oppressed group of people—-a race of people who were not that long ago thought of as to be so sub-human that our own late grandmother as a teen girl was handed a bag of left over eaten on plate scrapings from a white child’s birthday party by the child’s mother. According to our NaNa, this woman thought she was being nice. Our grandmother cleaned houses to help support her family before she left home to start her own brood. They lived in the south. Simple country black folks. Just tryin’ to do an honest days work to help put food on the table. But that wasn’t enough. They had to endure the worst kinds of spiritual and psychological humiliation and assault on a person’s dignity known to an American citizen.
Our grandmother walked off that job right after that white woman handed her that bag of birthday garbage to take home—left it on the kitchen counter—didn’t say goodbye and didn’t even get her day’s pay. And her family needed that money. We can only share this story without shame because our grandfather after marrying our grandmother almost killed a white man in another incident later on. So notorious was our grandfather he’s the sole reason our entire family lives in Los Angeles today. We only got a few lingering relations back in Texas. If our grandparents had of stayed in the south the white folks would’ve surely killed Poppa. He had a bounty on his head in the southern part of Texas. Still do. They had to get out. Snuck out of Wharton,Texas in the dead of night is the family lore. He was a mean ole yella’ gray-eyed foul-mouthed SOB. We weren’t particularly crazy about him either, truth be told.
We were about to say that the above story was a digression. And apologize for it. But no it isn’t. It is our history. It is also our now. Our grandparents gave us those legacies to share with our own creations someday. Even if those creations merely mounted up being these legacies shared on a marriage equality blog. These experiences, handed down via the generations, are a part of who we are RIGHT NOW.
Being homosexual is a part of who we are, too.
But therein lies the rub. The “too.” It’s a duplicity that separates us many times from the point of views of many of our gay white brethren. And some of our impassioned black ones as well. When we know that John F. Kennedy did not once utter a word about black civil rights in his first two years of office; when we know that the majority of George Bush’s eight horrific years in office the phrase “marriage equality” had barely an existence or meaning—let alone any visible protests for LGBT civil rights statewide or otherwise. When we know that the majority of Gay Incs in the state of California came out overwhelmingly in support of Hillary Clinton in the 2008 presidential primaries; only to turn around and throw their support behind Obama AFTER Clinton lost to him in the bid to become the democratic party candidate. But Gay Incs have been the first and (only ones so far) to scream how they supported him all along.
Black Americans are currently facing an unemployment rate of a staggering 16%. Even our college graduates can’t find jobs—gay or straight. The unemployment gap between African-Americans and others has widened to 7 percent according to CNN. Fifty percent of the homes foreclosed on are owned by African-Americans.
Black folks right now are catching pure hell. It’s very easy even for some of us gay blacks to look at a fat BMW driving Gay Inc like he’s a goddamned fool when he’s sniveling about his now often touted “second class citizenship” and we’re thinkin’ about the rent. And by no means are blacks singled out and suffering alone in the economic woes of late. The whole country is. This includes victimized and unprotected LGBT children, families, workers and individuals. Everybody wants change sooner rather than later. It’s something all of America can agree on.
The Gay Inc attacks on Obama have been almost as lengthy as their said support. As early as October of 2008, the Gay Incs started wailing and snipping in impatience in growing unison. We honestly and truthfully thought people were joking at first. Obama had yet to be sworn in; how could there be problems with the man? He hadn’t the power to do anything yet. But that didn’t stop them. And when Rick Warren presided over Obama’s inauguration it was on ‘n’ crackin.’ They’ve been on full-tilt boogie ever since.
And here’s the truth of the matter: if Obama, God forbid, should die today or tomorrow he will go down in American history as being the most LGBT-friendly president this nation has ever seen. The Gay Incs know this. They won’t admit it—but they know it. With less than a year to his credit, Obama—Christian Right death threats rolling in by the minute—has embraced the LGBT community more so than any president in this nation’s history.
So why the hate?
We think it’s because many in the LGBT community feels Obama owes them something—-yesterday. We can’t quite figure out why that is. Obama has yet to celebrate his first anniversary in office. Oh, it’s right around the corner. But still, he hasn’t seen it. We don’t quite understand why a similar resentment and/or impatience wasn’t bestowed on previous administrations. That, in truth, is really the nucleus of our curiosity. Is it because he’s black and they feel that well, he should easily be able to identify in a obligatory sense with the quest for civil rights?
When we ask that—the response is always a quick dismissive no. And yet the outrage exhibited by some of these individuals belies their words as to why their beyond comprehensible impatience in comparison to not so long ago worse political and social conditions. They weren’t like that a mere two years ago. Not even close. Fairly docile and silent actually. But now, Obama is the cause of all of their misery and unhappiness. And you know what?
We say:
BULLSHIT
It’s precisely because he’s black that Gay Inc is so infuriated with Obama. Because you see this is an opportunity that they need to grasp now with gusto. Oh yes, (We gon’ tell it all now Aintie Ginnie). It’s the only chance they have. Unless they get another black president in a later administration. Under a white president, the accusations of unfairness and homophobia just wouldn’t ring as loud. Who’d care? After all, it’s expected. But under an African American president? Ohhhhh, he should’ve been rolling out the equality carpet right as he was being sworn in. My God, he’s a descendent of friggin’ slaves. And well, his own damned parents weren’t even able to get married in some states. Surely this black man knows he should move with the highest and quickest expediency in regards to the full civil rights of all his subjects and constituency.
And then there’s reality. When we were children there were two portraits that hung in our grandparent’s living-room. They hung side by side. One was a portrait of Martin Luther King. The other was a portrait of John F. Kennedy. Our grandparents never told us that it took John F. Kennedy two years before he even discussed black civil rights. No. We found that out later in high school. Matter of fact, our grandparents never said anything about either of them. We just knew these men were very special men. At least they were in NaNa’s and Poppa’s house. We never even remember asking who they were. Somehow we just knew.
We don’t dare suggest or infer that anyone wait or not fight for their civil rights with everything they have and then some. Just be real about it. And be real about what you authentically need to put into that fight before you spread a smear campaign (cause that’s what it is) on a man who we, regardless of attacks by certain parties, truly believe wants and intends to do the right thing. And has his own way of going about doing just that. Which means that it may not come into fruition in a matter of less than 12-months for children of the Bush years. It may take some more doing than that. We don’t say let up—we say GET UP. Get off your whining finger-pointing asses and be accountable for your own freedom.
We may not always agree with the likes of Robin McGehee and Co.—well actually we rarely agree with her at all. And Lord knows it kills us to cheerlead—but we have to hand it to her—she puts her own ass on the line. Money—time—family relationships—she’s a fighter. Not a punk—like the way a good portion of the Gay Incs have been showing up. And continue to show up. As if they’re building a fan club from within and throughout. And they’re not. Their player hating is offensive, lazy and grosses us out. And we know we’re not alone.
We may think our Facebook connect Sean Chapin up in SF can be a little fanatical at times—but he’s the right stuff. He’s not a hater. Not that one. Definitely all fighter. The cat just will not let up. Ultimately it’s impressive. To hell with marriage equality, you want him to win. Same with the insanely optimistic Eric Ross, also of the Bay area. These people are for better or worse—inspiring. Not depressing.
This post is about channeling that energy people for the cause instead of for your victimhood. There’s no winning in that. If the battle for civil rights is that important to you Gay Incs—if you’re reading this—that’s where your time and energy needs to be. No one’s saying that you cannot or should not express your unhappiness with Obama. But can you do your own legwork—first? And can you express with dignity and truth based in the reality of what you say you haven’t received and very well deserve verses what you’ve quietly lived with throughout the majority your not new news gay “2nd class” existence here in America?
That’s all we got folks. Back to thinkin’ about that rent. And of course that missing unemployment check.
Possibly Related Posts:
- THE KIDS ARE ALL RIGHT, BUT NOT THE QUEER MOVEMENT
- The Tragedy Of The Black Gay Blogosphere Keeps Getting More Tragic
- Cleo Manago On The National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS): Will It Benefit Black People?
- Shirley Q. Liquor, Equality And The Double Standards Of Gay White Male Culture
- Nation’s Oldest Black Frat Joins Arizona Boycott And Why We Think They’re Bogus
Sphere: Related Content












20 December, 2009 at 9:33 am
The President is not exempt from criticism just because he is half-African American. The issues you pointed out above do not just affect the Black community, as you noted, and as citizens suffering we do have a right and purpose to criticize a lack of leadership on a variety of issues. He can’t do these twice a year rousing speeches and stay quiet the rest of the time… that is not leadership. Leaders speak, often, like Pres Reagan…
That said, it is important to differentiate between your individual friends and their criticism of the President as citizens and the “EQCA” & “Gay Inc”
Frankly, I think it is time for RENWL to put up on this issue and start collaborating with your Latino (LEAP) friends for example… On the part of Gay Inc I think there are some problems with the ferocious attacks on the President, but let your friends be in their criticism, there is a big difference… But we cannot organize against these Gay Inc institutionalized racist practices without working together. I do not see you willing to collaborate to initiate actions and campaigns within the LGBT community to affect these changes that are needed.
Maybe I’ll get a Gay Inc loser of the week profile this week for this response, but I am one of your biggest supporters and fans… so I think the truth is OK in this…
20 December, 2009 at 11:21 am
Gee Robert,
Somehow you must’ve missed a HUGE chunk of this essay and think you should read i again. To address your response would be unfair on our part at this point. May we advise you to read it slowly for clarification to many of the concerns you brought up in your response.
20 December, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Thank you for this! I too am sick and tired of the gays whining and crying about Obama. Really, so so so tired and just clueless. This is one gay white man who still thinks Obama is absolutely fabulous. I am in it for the long haul.
20 December, 2009 at 2:58 pm
Geez Derrick, dismissive of your friends and allies much?
Disagreement is not indicative of lack of understanding or comprehension…
Going forward, I will keep my opinions of your posts to myself…
Take Care,
Robert
20 December, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Robert, we’re at quite the loss as to your ummm….angst? We respectfully replied to your comment with our thoughts. That’s all we can do.
We apologize if we have offended you in some way in that regard.
@JIM: WE LOVE YOU JIMBO! KEEP KEEP KEEPIN’ ON! Chi-Town’s in da house!
20 December, 2009 at 3:37 pm
I think you hit the nail on the head with this piece. The emotion rang clear and true and resonates with my own frustration with the Obama-bashers. Any commenter who wants to claim you’re not being adult about this is in seriously bad faith. Thanks for posting.
20 December, 2009 at 7:18 pm
Thank you Daniel!
21 December, 2009 at 11:13 am
I always appreciate the passion and sincerity you bring to the table, Derrick. (You know I mean it!) However, I have to challenge you on a couple points. Speaking for so-called white liberals, my sense is that criticism of Obama presumes post-raciality. In contrast, you argue, “it’s precisely because he’s black that Gay Inc is so infuriated with Obama. Because you see this is an opportunity that they need to grasp now with gusto…. Under a white president, the accusations of unfairness and homophobia just wouldn’t ring as loud. Who’d care? After all, it’s expected.”
First of all, let’s all acknowledge that MLK’s post-racial America is still a dream and that we all have some serious soulwork to do in bringing it to light. The question is, are “unfairness and homophobia” (i.e., hate) really to be expected of white people? Do white liberals believe this about themselves or do others believe this about us? Your argument is complex and curious, Derrick. Basically, you’re saying that white folks expect Obama to be more just than they are because he’s black and that this is racist. I guess you’re right. That would be racist.
I believe that Americans (you and me included) have a fetish for race and identity politics of all types. We construct our identities and then go about our lives inflicting them on one another. One of my favorite writers is Jean Toomer, sometimes hailed as the father of the Harlem Renaissance, who chafed against the white literary establishment’s insistence on regarding him as a black writer. The following comes from a collection of aphorisms that he published in 1931 under the title Essentials:
The human fish is intricate and hidden; the appearances of his fins are deceptive / According to what a man is called, so will people tend to respond to him / Each of us has a so-called defect to which, in the eyes of our fellows and in our own eyes, we are reduced / To see the other person’s defect causes him to see your defect. The result: you and he meet on the plane of defects only / Thus we downgrade human experience.
As I see it, Toomer is describing the status quo, the opposite of MLK’s dream. Deliverance comes only when we choose to stop seeing each other’s defects, to stop regarding each other first and foremost as black people, white people, gays, lesbians, conservatives, liberals, etc. Recently, I came across this quote from Teilhard De Chardin: “Nothing is precious except that part of you which is in other people, and that part of others which is in you.”
If that sounds like a bunch of spiritual mumbo jumbo, then the last thing I’d say is that we’re talking about the right to marry, about an act of love and surrender. As a person who has been privileged to marry and have others bear witness to that commitment, it’s my sincere (and pompous) belief that gay and lesbian activists must not lose sight of the purpose of their struggle. If bitterness and anger arising from discrimination overshadow it, then people truly will have lost hope.
21 December, 2009 at 1:38 pm
It must be Windy City week. Chi-Town in da house again!
Brian, MY MAIN MAN.
Thank you so much for your very insightful comment. I know you have a small son and as I read your words I thought to myself, ‘damn that is one lucky kid.’
You’re a good man, Brian. And Lord I wish the LGBT environs (especially the political portion) could or would stand in the place that you come from in your commentary.
But they don’t. We don’t. Does that sadden us? Yes. Some of us. I’d like to point out a couple things you mentioned:
In reference to the passage:
“It’s precisely because he’s black that Gay Inc is so infuriated with Obama. Because you see this is an opportunity that they need to grasp now with gusto…. Under a white president, the accusations of unfairness and homophobia just wouldn’t ring as loud. Who’d care? After all, it’s expected.”
I didn’t say “white America” expected Obama to be more just. I said “GAY INC” expects Obama to be more just. And that only comes from the information I have received—FROM THEM.
I define Gay Inc as a homosexual American who’s sole identity and the filter in which they view the world–
politically/socially/culturally/philosophically— is based on their sexuality meshed with revered respect for white anglo saxon protestant cultural contraints, traditions, accepted “norms” and most of all—the desire and need for this identity—as representative as the “norm” for all LGBTs.
Gay Incs can be and are any ethnicity by the way. Many gay whites do not fit that bill at all. Many gay blacks do. The majority of Gay Incs I would say are white. And Gay Incs have brought Obama’s racial heritage and obligation into play “routinely” in print and in discussion.
In just one of thousands upon thousands of examples I invite you to pay more close attention to Huffington Post articles written about LGBTs and civil rights. Obama’s obligation due soley to race rarely fails NOT to be an arrow thrown at him for his perceived sluggish actions in regards to LGBT civil rights and the draconian laws that preceded his administration.
I am simply responding to all of it. Months and months and months of it. Let us be clear—this post is a RESPONSE.
The other item I’d like to address is that it would be so wonderful indeed—if the LGBT community did not reflect itself a microcosm of America in regards to race and racism. We’re afraid it does. It also reflects the country’s class issues.
Luckily, all of this joyously and hideously subject to a glaring and harsh light under the age of Obama and the quest for LGBT civil rights.
In the end I most certainly agree with you. Until we get it together within—-we’re most certainly going to continue to do—without. Only a fool would believe otherwise. Here’s to quick healing growing pains and God’s speed in the maturing of America’s LGBT community.
Love you so much. And I’m so glad we’re still a part of each other’s lives and each other’s hearts.
d:)